Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Aims and Scope »

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue NLG for Spoken Dialogue Systems

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue on Question Generation

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Special Issue on Dialogue State Tracking

Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

There are no fixed issues, articles are published as soon as the final version has been accepted (we are committed to achieving a mean time between submission and decision of 3 months).

Reviewing is single-blind (the identities of reviewers are not known to authors, but that of the authors is known to the reviewers). At least three reviewers will review each submission that is not a desk reject. Of course, no conflicts of interest are allowed, and authors of papers may not come into contact with any part of the acceptance process.

See the Guidelines for Reviewing

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.